Johann Michael Haydn, born 1737, in the village of Rohrau, Austria, to a father who was a wheelwright and local mayor, a mother who had worked as a cook for the local aristocrat, Count Harrach. Hadyn’s father dabbled in music even teaching himself to play the harp and with that he also made sure that his children learned to sing. Both Johann and his older brother Joseph sang in the choir at St. Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna, very prestigious at the time. After his time in the choir Johann was appointed Kapellmeister at GroBwardien, or music master and later at Salzburg where he worked for forty-three years. During his tenure as Kapellmeister at Salzburg he wrote over 360 compositions for the church and many other instrumental pieces. It was during this time that he wrote Incidental Music to Voltaire’s ‘Zaire’. I actually chose this piece by random because I wanted to write about something that wasn’t main stream, yet after researching the music and looking at what it was written for an interesting comparison comes up. Here you have a composer who has written over 360 works for the church, a church that is trying to adhere to the credo of the Council of Trent, and you have a theatrical work about Muslimism. In addition to writing the music for the play he also used a musical style that was popular at the time but not an accepted Christian genre. “Turkish” music was the genre of music that was used, it included five segments and many special effects were expressed in the music. The play by Voltaire is written about some Christians that were slaves of Osman a Sultan of Turkey and their lives growing up in his palace. One girl Zara accepts Muslim faith and agrees to marry Osman. The question that I mule about in my head is; what is a christen, who has written hundreds of works for the Catholic Church doing writing music for Voltaire’s play about a christen converting to the Muslim faith?
July 3, 2009 at 9:34 am |
In this blog the author gives a brief description of the composer life and why he is famous. They included all of the necessarily details about the composition and why they chose it- they did it a random, with the aim of finding a unique piece that no one else would find. They mentioned who the composure was Christian and worked for the church, but not mention the middle class outwardly- and if they referenced it I did not pick up on it. But they did bring up a very interesting point about Haydn being Christian but composing a piece for Voltaire’s story which was in a Muslin kingdom where the Christians were slaves- and one of them actually converted to Muslimism and married a Muslim. I think that is very interesting, especially since the church did not appear to find it blasphemous. Maybe the Church was becoming more relaxed as more people became educated and the middle class emerged. Nice review though. -Maureen O’Callaghan
July 4, 2009 at 5:50 am |
I thought your backround information about the piece was very interesting and I really enjoyed that you added your little questioning of morals at the end there. It is an interesting question to ask, and I think a lot of the time artists had to work for the church in order to be accepted, but in the end really questioned thier faith. The piece was very relaxinng but captivating at the same time, good choice.
July 4, 2009 at 8:05 am |
That is an interesting note you made about a Christian writing about conversion into the Muslim faith. Why do you think he was not persecuted for this? Or was there a moral behind his art? I thought that was very surprising that he was allowed to do this under the Council of Trent. I have never heard of this man before but now I’m curious to know more.
You gave factual information about this piece as well as how you chose it. Good job on not choosing something mainstream though. I have never heard this piece before and really enjoyed listening to it. How does this piece relate to the rise of the middle class?
July 7, 2009 at 4:51 pm |
this is just a trouble shooting post as I am scratching my head trying to figure out problems with the mechanics of blogging. No need to respond or even notice.